Bookbot

Just satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights

Autores

  • Autores varios

Parámetros

  • 410 páginas
  • 15 horas de lectura

Más información sobre el libro

How effective is the European Court of Human Rights in dispensing justice? With over 17,000 judgments handed down, it is undoubtedly the most prolific international court but is it the most efficient when compensating the victims of a violation? This crucial but often overlooked question is the focus of this important new monograph which gives a clear, comprehensive and convincing demonstration of the negative impact, in terms of unpredictability and legal uncertainty, of the discretion used by the Court when it comes to the regime of reparation. It reveals the adverse influence of such a high discretion on the quality of its rulings - ultimately on the coherence of the system and on the Court's authority, and makes suggestions for improvement.

Compra de libros

Just satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights, Autores varios

Idioma
Publicado en
2015
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Tapa dura)
Te avisaremos por correo electrónico en cuanto lo localicemos.

Métodos de pago

Nadie lo ha calificado todavía.Añadir reseña

Título
Just satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights
Idioma
Inglés
Publicado en
2015
Formato
Tapa dura
Páginas
410
ISBN10
1107072360
ISBN13
9781107072367
Serie
Descripción
How effective is the European Court of Human Rights in dispensing justice? With over 17,000 judgments handed down, it is undoubtedly the most prolific international court but is it the most efficient when compensating the victims of a violation? This crucial but often overlooked question is the focus of this important new monograph which gives a clear, comprehensive and convincing demonstration of the negative impact, in terms of unpredictability and legal uncertainty, of the discretion used by the Court when it comes to the regime of reparation. It reveals the adverse influence of such a high discretion on the quality of its rulings - ultimately on the coherence of the system and on the Court's authority, and makes suggestions for improvement.