Bookbot

Political Philosophy versus History?

Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought

Valoración del libro

Más información sobre el libro

Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.

Compra de libros

Political Philosophy versus History?, Jonathan Floyd, Marc Stears

Idioma
Publicado en
2011
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Tapa blanda)
Te avisaremos por correo electrónico en cuanto lo localicemos.

Métodos de pago

3,4
Bueno
3 Valoraciones

Nos falta tu reseña aquí

Título
Political Philosophy versus History?
Subtítulo
Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought
Idioma
Inglés
Publicado en
2011
Formato
Tapa blanda
Páginas
240
ISBN10
0521146887
ISBN13
9780521146883
Serie
Calificación
3,35 de 5
Descripción
Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.