Bookbot

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99

Autores

  • Autores varios

Valoración del libro

Parámetros

  • 425 páginas
  • 15 horas de lectura

Más información sobre el libro

Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”

Compra de libros

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99, Autores varios

Idioma
Publicado en
1999
Encuadernación
(Tapa dura)
Te avisaremos por correo electrónico en cuanto lo localicemos.

Métodos de pago

5,0
Excelente
1 Valoraciones

Nos falta tu reseña aquí

Título
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99
Idioma
Inglés
Publicado en
1999
Formato
Tapa dura
Páginas
425
ISBN10
0674379470
ISBN13
9780674379473
Serie
Calificación
5 de 5
Descripción
Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”