Reasonable Doubts

Más información sobre el libro

Focusing on the intricacies of the criminal justice system, this analysis delves into the O.J. Simpson case, exploring the paradoxes faced by jurors, such as the conflict between personal beliefs and legal obligations. The author, a well-known legal expert, examines how a juror convinced of Simpson's guilt could be compelled to deliver an innocent verdict. Additionally, the book discusses the implications of a potential appeal had the trial concluded differently, providing a comprehensive view of legal processes and their impact on justice.