Bookbot

Social Responsibility in Research Practice

Engaging Applied Scientists With the Socio-Ethical Context of Their Work

Más información sobre el libro

How to encourage researchers to critically reflect on the ethical and social dimensions of their work? That is the central research question of this thesis. It starts from the assumption that the neutrality view of the social responsibility of the researcher - the view that researchers have no business with the social and ethical dimensions of their work - has become untenable, at least as far as applied sciences such as nano- and biotechnology are concerned. Instead, this thesis adopts a broader view, arguing that the social responsibility of researchers includes a moral responsibility to critically reflect on the socio-ethical context of their work. While this normative viewpoint itself is not uncommon, the neutrality view remains a dominant frame of reference in daily research practice. The specific contribution this thesis aims to make to the ongoing debate is to 'revalue value-free science': by way of three case studies (the implementation of a code of conduct for scientific practice, interdisciplinary collaborations between social and natural scientists, and the development of 'science and society' education), it explores opportunities and constraints for realising a broadened conception of social responsibility in daily research practice.

Compra de libros

Social Responsibility in Research Practice, Daniël Schuurbiers, Louis-Philippe Breydel, Peter Kroes, Anthonie Meijers

Idioma
Publicado en
2010
Encuadernación
(Tapa blanda),
Estado del libro
Bueno
Precio
111,99 €

Métodos de pago

Nadie lo ha calificado todavía.Añadir reseña

Título
Social Responsibility in Research Practice
Subtítulo
Engaging Applied Scientists With the Socio-Ethical Context of Their Work
Idioma
Inglés, Holandés
Publicado en
2010
Formato
Tapa blanda
ISBN10
903862378X
ISBN13
9789038623788
Serie
Etiquetas
Descripción
How to encourage researchers to critically reflect on the ethical and social dimensions of their work? That is the central research question of this thesis. It starts from the assumption that the neutrality view of the social responsibility of the researcher - the view that researchers have no business with the social and ethical dimensions of their work - has become untenable, at least as far as applied sciences such as nano- and biotechnology are concerned. Instead, this thesis adopts a broader view, arguing that the social responsibility of researchers includes a moral responsibility to critically reflect on the socio-ethical context of their work. While this normative viewpoint itself is not uncommon, the neutrality view remains a dominant frame of reference in daily research practice. The specific contribution this thesis aims to make to the ongoing debate is to 'revalue value-free science': by way of three case studies (the implementation of a code of conduct for scientific practice, interdisciplinary collaborations between social and natural scientists, and the development of 'science and society' education), it explores opportunities and constraints for realising a broadened conception of social responsibility in daily research practice.