Parámetros
- 172 páginas
- 7 horas de lectura
Más información sobre el libro
The book explores the implications of cost-benefit analysis within economic decision-making, particularly regarding climate change as a key sustainability challenge. It critiques the normative underpinnings of this approach, arguing that its empirical basis is flawed and conflicts with liberal-democratic principles, such as universal ethical standards and freedom rights. Additionally, it highlights challenges in applying cost-benefit analysis effectively, especially in environmental legislation. While acknowledging its potential to inform ethical and legal decisions, the author views it as a limited, supplementary tool rather than a definitive solution.
Compra de libros
Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics, Felix Ekardt
- Idioma
- Publicado en
- 2022
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Tapa dura)
Métodos de pago
Nadie lo ha calificado todavía.
- Título
- Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics
- Subtítulo
- A Review with Regard to Climate Change Figures in the Sustainability Discourse
- Idioma
- Inglés
- Autores
- Felix Ekardt
- Editorial
- Springer International Publishing
- Publicado en
- 2022
- Formato
- Tapa dura
- Páginas
- 172
- ISBN13
- 9783030992835
- Serie
- Etiquetas
- No ficción, Ciencias sociales, Comercio, Negocios & Gestión, Ciencias políticas & Política, Temática filosófica, Temática jurídica, Derecho, Economía
- Descripción
- The book explores the implications of cost-benefit analysis within economic decision-making, particularly regarding climate change as a key sustainability challenge. It critiques the normative underpinnings of this approach, arguing that its empirical basis is flawed and conflicts with liberal-democratic principles, such as universal ethical standards and freedom rights. Additionally, it highlights challenges in applying cost-benefit analysis effectively, especially in environmental legislation. While acknowledging its potential to inform ethical and legal decisions, the author views it as a limited, supplementary tool rather than a definitive solution.