Bookbot

The Meaning of Conservatism

Valoración del libro

Más información sobre el libro

Book Description: First published in 1980, this contribution to political thought is a statement of the traditional conservative position. Roger Scruton challenges those who would regard themselves as conservatives, and also their opponents. Conservatism, he argues, has little in common with liberalism, and is only tenuously related to the market economy, to monetarism, to free enterprise or to capitalism. It involves neither hostility towards the state, nor the desire to limit the state's obligation towards the citizen. Its conceptions of society, law and citizenship regard the individual not as the premise but as the conclusion of politics. At the same time it is fundamentally opposed to the ethic of social justice, to equality of station, opportunity, income and achievement, and to the attempt to bring major institutions of society such as schools and universities under government control.

Publicación

Compra de libros

The Meaning of Conservatism, Roger Scruton

Idioma
Publicado en
2020
Encuadernación
(Tapa blanda),
Estado del libro
Bueno
Precio
15,49 €

Métodos de pago

4,0
Muy bueno
167 Valoraciones

Nos falta tu reseña aquí

Título
The Meaning of Conservatism
Idioma
Inglés
Publicado en
2020
Formato
Tapa blanda
ISBN10
1587315033
ISBN13
9781587315039
Serie
Primera publicación
1980
Título original
The Meaning of Conservatism
Calificación
3,95 de 5
Descripción
Book Description: First published in 1980, this contribution to political thought is a statement of the traditional conservative position. Roger Scruton challenges those who would regard themselves as conservatives, and also their opponents. Conservatism, he argues, has little in common with liberalism, and is only tenuously related to the market economy, to monetarism, to free enterprise or to capitalism. It involves neither hostility towards the state, nor the desire to limit the state's obligation towards the citizen. Its conceptions of society, law and citizenship regard the individual not as the premise but as the conclusion of politics. At the same time it is fundamentally opposed to the ethic of social justice, to equality of station, opportunity, income and achievement, and to the attempt to bring major institutions of society such as schools and universities under government control.