Bookbot

Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change

Autores

Guardar

Parámetros

  • 200 páginas
  • 7 horas de lectura

Más información sobre el libro

Roger Lass is concerned about the nature of argumentation within linguistics and the status of its data and theoretical constructs. Through an examination of standard strategies of explanation in historical linguistics (particularly of phonological change), in the light of past approaches to scientific epistemology, Dr Lass convincingly demonstrates that attempts to model explanations of linguistic change on those of the physical sciences are failures both in practice and in principle. Linguists can neither assimilate their discipline crudely to the natural or the other human sciences nor, at the other extreme, shelter behind the notion of a private self-validating paradigm. Although Dr Lass outlines some tentative paths towards an alternative epistemology, his main concern is that linguists should confront the philosophical implications of their subject, and he raises questions which both linguists and philosophers will need to consider.

Compra de libros

Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change, Roger Lass

Idioma
Publicado en
1980
Encuadernación
(Tapa dura),
Estado del libro
Bueno
Precio
37,99 €

Métodos de pago

Nadie lo ha calificado todavía.Añadir reseña

Título
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change
Idioma
Inglés
Autores
Roger Lass
Publicado en
1980
Formato
Tapa dura
Páginas
200
ISBN10
0521228360
ISBN13
9780521228367
Serie
Etiquetas
Descripción
Roger Lass is concerned about the nature of argumentation within linguistics and the status of its data and theoretical constructs. Through an examination of standard strategies of explanation in historical linguistics (particularly of phonological change), in the light of past approaches to scientific epistemology, Dr Lass convincingly demonstrates that attempts to model explanations of linguistic change on those of the physical sciences are failures both in practice and in principle. Linguists can neither assimilate their discipline crudely to the natural or the other human sciences nor, at the other extreme, shelter behind the notion of a private self-validating paradigm. Although Dr Lass outlines some tentative paths towards an alternative epistemology, his main concern is that linguists should confront the philosophical implications of their subject, and he raises questions which both linguists and philosophers will need to consider.