Roberto Esposito Libros

De donde nace la politica? Que la vincula a la terrible guerra de Troya, que la precede y en cierto modo la determina? Cual es su relacion con la libertad y el mal, con la justicia y el poder? Estas son las preguntas esenciales que recorren el presente libro, en el cual la indagacion sobre el origen de la politica forma un todo con la de su destino. Su elemento de mas interes consiste en que tales preguntas les son planteadas a las dos mayores pensadoras del siglo, Hannah Arendt y Simone Weil, por uno de sus mas sensibles interpretes, Roberto Esposito. Y desde este punto de vista la obra constituye el primer cuerpo a cuerpo entre dos pensamientos que han hecho de la politica su objetivo privilegiado. Sin embargo, a pesar de su singular proximidad espiritual e incluso geografica ambas son mujeres, judias y marcadas por la experiencia de la persecucion y el exilio, Arendt y Weil emiten respuestas profundamente distintas a los grandes interrogantes que todavia nos inquietan. Grecia, Roma, la tradicion cristiana y el totalitarismo del siglo XX son los lugares del tiempo en que se desarrolla esta apasionada confrontacion. Publico destinatario:

"The notion of the "impolitical" developed in this volume draws its meaning from the exhaustion of modernity's political categories, which have become incapable of giving voice to any genuinely radical perspective. The impolitical is not the opposite of the political but rather its outer limit: the border from which we might glimpse a trajectory away from all forms of political theology and the depoliticizing tendencies of a completed modernity. The book's reconstruction of the impolitical lineage-which is anything but uniform-begins with the extreme conclusions reached by Carl Schmitt and Romano Guardini in their reflections on the political and then moves through a series of encounters between several great twentieth-century texts: from Hannah Arendt's On Revolution to Hermann Broch's The Death of Virgil, to Elias Canetti's Crowds and Power; from Simone Weil's The Need for Roots to Georges Bataille's Sovereignty to Ernst Junger's An der Zeitmauer. The trail forged by this analysis offers a defiant counterpoint to the modern political lexicon, but at the same time a contribution to our understanding of its categories" Provided by publisher

Exploring the historical foundations of political theology, this book examines the interplay between Roman and Christian ideas about the individual, highlighting how these concepts create exclusionary dynamics that unify by division. It advocates for a shift towards a more impersonal and universally accessible understanding of thought, offering a path to dismantle the oppressive frameworks that have emerged from these traditions.

This book by Roberto Esposito - one of Italy's leading political philosophers - is a highly original exploration of the relationship between human bodies and societies. Starting from a reflection on the nature of immunization, Esposito offers a wide-ranging analysis of contemporary biopolitics.

The pandemic has brought into sharp relief the fundamental relationship between institution and human life: at the very moment when the virus was threatening to destroy life, human beings called upon institutions - on governments, on health systems, on new norms of behavior - to combat the virus and preserve life. Drawing on this and other examples, Roberto Esposito argues that institutions and human life are not opposed to one another but rather two sides of a single figure that, together, delineate the vital character of institutions and the instituting power of life. What else is life, after all, if not a continuous institution, a capacity for self-regeneration along new and unexplored paths? No human life is reducible to pure survival, to "bare life." There is always a point at which life reaches out beyond primary needs, entering into the realm of desires and choices, passions and projects, and at that point human life becomes instituted: it becomes part of the web of relations that constitute social, political, and cultural life.

Roberto Esposito, a leading Italian philosopher, deconstructs the notion of community by examining its etymological roots in the Latin munus, or gift, and then reads against classical political interpretations of community.

This book, itself by a major Italian philosopher, explores the distinctive traits of Italian theory and philosophy, reflecting on why it has been growing in popularity and why people have turned to it for answers to real-world issues and problems.

This new book by the Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito addresses the profound crisis of contemporary politics and examines some of the philosophical approaches that have been used to try to understand and go beyond this crisis. Two approaches have been particularly influential – one indebted to the thought of Martin Heidegger, the other indebted to Gilles Deleuze. While opposed in their political thrust and orientation, both approaches remain trapped within the political ontology that has framed our conceptual language for some time. In order to move beyond this political ontology, Esposito turns to a third approach that he characterizes as ‘instituting thought’. Indebted to the work of the French political philosopher Claude Lefort, this third approach recognizes that the road to reconstructing a productive relation between ontology and politics, one that is both realistic and innovative, lies in instituting praxis. Building on this insight, Esposito conceptualizes social being as neither univocal nor plurivocal but as cross-cut by the dual semantics of political conflict. This new book by one of the most original European philosophers writing today will be of great interest to students and scholars in philosophy, social and political theory and the humanities generally.