Hanna Lierse Libros

The project explores the nuances of the European economic governance system, focusing on why certain economic policies, like business taxation, are governed by soft coordination while monetary policy follows a supranational approach. Utilizing a discursive institutionalist perspective, it emphasizes the significance of issue-specific knowledge and political communication within the EU. Previous research has shed light on how ideas and communication foster consensus among supranational elites, yet it often overlooks the reasons behind the emergence of varied cooperation modes. This project addresses that gap by conducting a comparative, longitudinal case study of business taxation and monetary policy, highlighting the contrasting governance forms. It reveals that reform ideas are pivotal in shaping governance outcomes, influencing perceptions of relevance and feasibility. Additionally, the findings indicate key aspects of European political communication: market-liberal reforms tend to have an advantage in decision-making, as more interventionist approaches require broader consensus, which is challenging in a politically diverse Union. The public discourse largely reflects the Commission’s official agenda, lacking left- and right-wing policy alternatives. This absence is critical for addressing economic policy frustrations and fostering a more sustainable and legitimate Community.