This study evaluates the rights of children in Iran and Germany, chosen for their contrasting legal frameworks and cultural contexts. Iranian laws are rooted in Islamic principles, while Germany operates without such religious mandates. The research delves into the origins of child abuse in both nations, highlighting significant differences influenced by culture, religion, and socio-economic conditions. A comparative analysis of constitutional, criminal, and civil laws reveals that Iranian legislation needs to align more closely with international standards to enhance child rights. The study advocates for the principle of "dynamicity" in Islamic jurisprudence, suggesting that laws should adapt to contemporary circumstances to mitigate risks and improve compliance with global norms. It emphasizes the necessity of protecting children in legal proceedings, noting that Iranian procedural laws currently lack adequate safeguards. The research questions whether both countries' legal systems effectively protect children from abuse, while also exploring Iranian parental attitudes toward issues like child abuse prevalence and gender discrimination. Ultimately, the findings underscore the crucial role society plays in nurturing children, asserting that the future of any society hinges on its ability to secure and uphold children's rights and protections.
