Reference is a central topic in the philosophy of language, linguistic
semantics, and related areas of philosophy and linguistics. This textbook
offers an up-to-date introduction to key debates about reference. While
comprehensive in approach, it is written for students and does not assume any
prior training in philosophy of language.
Context and Communication offers an introduction to a central theme in the study of language: the various ways in which what we say (or ask, or think) depends on the context of speech and thought. The period since 1970 has produced a vast literature on this topic, both by philosophers and by linguists. It is one of the areas of philosophy (and linguistics) where most progress has been made over the last few decades. This book explores some of the central data, questions, concepts, and theories of context sensitivity. It is written to be accessible to someone with no prior knowledge of the material or, indeed, any prior knowledge of philosophy, and is ideal for use as part of a philosophy of language course by students of philosophy or linguistics.Context and Communication is the first in the series Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy of Language. Each book in the series provides an introduction to an important topic in philosophy of language. The second volume on reference is currently in preparation. These textbooks can be used as a module in a philosophy of language course, for either undergraduate or graduate students.
The standard view of philosophical methodology is that philosophers rely on
intuitions as evidence. Herman Cappelen argues that this claim is false, and
reveals how it has encouraged pseudo-problems, presented misguided ideas of
what philosophy is, and misled exponents of metaphilosophy and experimental
philosophy.
Bad Language is the first textbook on an emerging area in the study of
language: non-idealized language use, the linguistic behaviour of people who
exploit language for malign purposes. This lively, accessible introduction
offers theoretical frameworks for thinking about such topics as lies and
bullshit, slurs and insults, coercion and silencing.
Cappelen and Dever present a forceful challenge to the standard view that
perspective, and in particular the perspective of the first person, is a
philosophically deep aspect of the world. Their goal is not to show that we
need to explain indexical and other perspectival phenomena in different ways,
but to show that the entire topic is an illusion.
Herman Cappelen investigates how language and other representational devices
can go wrong, and how to fix them. We use language to understand and talk
about the world, but what if our language has deficiencies that prevent it
from playing that role? How can we revise our concepts, and what are the
limits on revision?