Anatol Rapoport Libros

Corresponde al general prusiano Carl von Clausewitz el mérito de haber sido el primero en advertir el carácter de instrumento político de la guerra. «La guerra no es más que la continuación de la política del Estado por otros medios», afirmaba. Y de ahí su claro postulado: el ejército tiene que someterse siempre a la política y a las directrices de ella emanadas.Esta obra, cuya última y completa versión se traduce por primera vez al español directamente desde su lengua original, el alemán, constituye un relevante trabajo de la literatura militar que aspira a acercarse intelectualmente al fenómeno bélico, a identificar los factores determinantes del conflicto y a analizar su funcionamiento interno.De la guerra ocupó doce años de la vida de su autor. Su mujer, la condesa de Brühl, se encargó de la edición póstuma de este breviario estratégico que está considerado una imprescindible referencia bibliográfica y que, como señala Gabriel Cardona en el estudio preliminar, ejerció una extraordinaria influencia en todos los tiempos, desde Napoleón a Lenin.

VG+ **STATED First published 1974, NAP, DC Included, New Packaging, Great Copy .. No Marks .. No Tears .. No Creases …*Every book/item is cleaned and inspected for Defects/Condition… minor shelf wear/handling .. Minor highlighting … Very Clean … No Curling … Vintage Inventory … (***Buy with Confidence with over 2000 satisfied customers***) …. GM/sc/S4

Focusing on the intricate relationships between culture and the physical environment, this volume presents an eclectic collection of perspectives drawn from various disciplines, including psychology, geography, and anthropology. Contributors explore how cultural factors influence environmental design and the variability of these relationships across different contexts. The volume is organized with the collaboration of Amos Rapoport, who integrates anthropology and architecture, enriching the discourse on environmental design. Future volumes will continue to delve into specific topics, including transportation.

The book explores the critical distinction between normative and descriptive decision theory, emphasizing their relevance in understanding decision-making processes. Normative decision theory focuses on how rational decisions should be made, employing formal mathematical language and rigorous definitions. In contrast, descriptive decision theory examines how people actually make decisions in real-life situations, often influenced by complex details and ambiguities. This comprehensive approach aims to clarify the theoretical foundations of decision-making while acknowledging the intricacies of human behavior.

This book presents a systemic view of societal, cultural, and scientific evolution over the past two centuries. It is the latest work by a leading thinker in systems theory and the peace movement, Anatol Rapoport, the last surviving founder of the “Society for General Systems Research.” A professor emeritus of Mathematics and Psychology at the University of Toronto, Rapoport has authored over 400 publications, including around 30 books, covering diverse subjects such as Philosophy, Systems Theory, Game Theory, and Peace Research. His writings reflect a systemic perspective, showcasing his inquisitive mind and prolific writing ability. In this opus, Rapoport synthesizes his thoughts through a Socratic dialogue with three Russian interlocutors: Leo Tolstoy, Feodor Dostoevsky, and Vladimir Lenin, all of whom share an obsession with struggle and debate. Rapoport masterfully blends Mathematics and Philosophy, with the most significant insights found in the final chapter, where he poses three critical questions for humanity's survival. The concise answers provide clear guidance, surpassing any previous survival blueprints. This captivating work distills the wisdom of a ninety-year-old genius, offering a rich reward for any open-minded reader.

„Aggression“ und „Anpassung“ sind längst aus rein psychologischen Kategorien zu solchen der Politologie und der Sozialwissenschaften geworden: Kategorien zur Aufhellung von Konflikten, in denen individuelle und kollektive Ansprüche und Zwänge gegeneinander wirken. In diesem Sinne werden sie jedenfalls in den hier zusammengetragenen Studien gebraucht, als Begriffe für bestimmte Verhaltensweisen und allgemeine Entwicklungstendenzen in der Industriegesellschaft.