Steven Lukes es un distinguido teórico político y social cuya obra profundiza en las complejidades del poder, la ideología y la justicia social. Sus contribuciones intelectuales han moldeado el pensamiento contemporáneo, ofreciendo profundas perspectivas sobre las fuerzas que gobiernan las sociedades e influyen en la vida de los individuos. La carrera académica de Lukes se ha desarrollado en instituciones prestigiosas, lo que subraya su significativo impacto en el discurso político y sociológico.
Everyone holds beliefs. So what gives us the right to judge the behaviour of others in a world where ethics seem increasingly diverse and conflicting? Do universal human rights exist, or do we just have to accept that there's an irreparable moral discord between us and the other?
<i>Die neugierige Aufklärung des Professors Caritat</i> ist eine brillante fiktive Reise durch die westliche politische Philosophie eines unserer originellsten Denker. Professor Caritat, ein mittelalter Candide, wandert naiv durch die benachbarten Länder Utilitaria, Communitaria und Libertaria auf der Suche nach der besten aller möglichen Welten. Von den Grenzen seines Elfenbeinturms befreit, sieht sich dieser umherirrende Professor mit dem verwirrten Zustand des modernen Denkens in dieser schillernden Komödie der Ideen konfrontiert.
In a converted European castle a weekend conference is taking place. Gathered together is a group of architects, town planners and government officials, and the action of the play concerns itself with the professional, intellectual, ideological and sexual concerns of the participants.
Are there absolute truths that can be gradually approached over time through rational processes? Or are all modes and systems of thought equally valid if viewed from within their own internally consistent frames of reference? Are there universal forms of reasoning and understanding that enable us to distinguish between rational beliefs and those that are demonstrably false, or is everything relative? These central questions are addressed and debated by the distinguished contributors to this lively book. Some of them - Hollis, Lukes, Robin Horton, and Ernest Gellner - discuss new directions in their thinking since their earlier articles appeared in 1970 in the seminal volume Rationality (edited by Bryan Wilson). They are now joined in the debate by Ian Hacking, W. Newton-Smith, Charles Taylor, Jon Elster, Dan Sperber, and, in the jointly authored lead article, by Barry Barnes and David Bloor. Emerging from the debate are a variety of supportable interpretations and conclusions rather than a single, distinct "truth." The contributors represent the complete spectrum of positions between a relativism that challenges the very concept of a single world and the idea that there are ascertainable, objective universals.