What Makes Communication Reliable in a Post-Truth World
178 páginas
7 horas de lectura
Exploring the intricate relationship between language and truth, this book offers a comprehensive theoretical framework that examines how communication shapes our understanding of reality. It is an essential resource for scholars, researchers, and students interested in the philosophical and practical implications of language in conveying truth.
An accessible and thorough introduction to implicatures, a key topic in
pragmatics. It will appeal to students and teachers in linguistics, applied
linguistics, psychology and sociology, who are interested in how language is
used for communication, and how children and second language learners develop
pragmatic skills.
What Pragmatics Tells Us About Language And Communication
There is, at present, no book introducing the general issue of why language is specific to human beings, how it works, why language is not communication and communication is not language, why languages vary and how they evolved. Based on the most recent works in linguistics and pragmatics, Why Language? addresses many questions that everyone has about language. Starting from false claims about language and languages, showing that language is not communication and communication is not language, the first part (Language and Communication) ends by proposing a difference between linguistic rules and communicative principles. The second part (Language, Society, Discourse) includes domains of language and language uses which are generally taken as extrinsic to language, such as language variety, discourse and non-ordinary (literary) usages. Special attention is given to figures of discourse (metaphor, metonymy, irony) and literary usages such as narration and free indirect style. The reader, either specialist or amateur in language science, will find a first and unique synthesis about what we know today about language and what we have yet to learn, sketching what could be the future of linguistics in the next decades.
Cet ouvrage est le résultat d'une semaine de formation doctorale pour les étudiants en linguistique de Suisse romande qui a permis à des chercheurs européens en sémantique et en pragmatique de présenter des recherches actuelles dans le domaine de la référence temporelle et de la référence nominale. Il donne un panorama non seulement représentatif des derniers travaux sur la référence, mais permet de donner des indications sur les recherches à venir dans le domaine des théories de la référence.
Que signifie, dans le cadre de l'interaction en face à face, contredire son interlocuteur? Quelles sont les conséquences d'une telle attitude communicative sur la poursuite de la conversation? Quels problèmes doivent résoudre les interlocuteurs pour «sauver» l'interaction ou tout au moins laisser entendre qu'ils continuent à coopérer? Telles sont les questions que cet ouvrage tente d'aborder du point de vue de la pragmatique linguistique. Si ce domaine de recherche a été consacré jusqu'ici à l'étude des actes de langage en «discours idéal», l'ouvrage propose une ex- tension de ce secteur de la linguistique à l'analyse de conversations polémiques.