Bookbot

Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy

Valoración del libro

Más información sobre el libro

Books on epistemology tend to be dreary affairs. Epistemology, which is the branch of philosophy that studies how human beings acquire and "validate" their knowledge, tend to be largely speculative and logical. Most theories of epistemology that are inflicted upon the world are nothing more than highly artificial constructions of some philosopher's speculations as to how men "ought" to attain and validate their knowledge. Any correspondence to how men really attain knowledge is usually pure coincidence. Moreover, in many instances, the epistemological philosopher has some special agenda which he is seeking to impose on his readers by confusing them with a mass of epistemological pedantry. He may be trying to prove the validity of a largely speculative form of "reason" or of definitions or of certainty or of a perfect a immaculate form of "objectivity" or of some other equally utopian and irrelevant principle

Compra de libros

Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Michael Polanyi

Idioma
Publicado en
1974
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Tapa blanda)
Te avisaremos por correo electrónico en cuanto lo localicemos.

Métodos de pago

4,3
Muy bueno
80 Valoraciones

Nos falta tu reseña aquí

Título
Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Idioma
Inglés
Publicado en
1974
Formato
Tapa blanda
Páginas
442
ISBN10
0226672883
ISBN13
9780226672885
Serie
Calificación
4,3 de 5
Descripción
Books on epistemology tend to be dreary affairs. Epistemology, which is the branch of philosophy that studies how human beings acquire and "validate" their knowledge, tend to be largely speculative and logical. Most theories of epistemology that are inflicted upon the world are nothing more than highly artificial constructions of some philosopher's speculations as to how men "ought" to attain and validate their knowledge. Any correspondence to how men really attain knowledge is usually pure coincidence. Moreover, in many instances, the epistemological philosopher has some special agenda which he is seeking to impose on his readers by confusing them with a mass of epistemological pedantry. He may be trying to prove the validity of a largely speculative form of "reason" or of definitions or of certainty or of a perfect a immaculate form of "objectivity" or of some other equally utopian and irrelevant principle