This book uniquely presents a sophisticated account of possible approaches to constitutional interpretation and also examines how major provisions in the U.S. Constitution are, and should be, interpreted.
Exploring the tension between hate speech and the First Amendment, this book delves into critical legal questions surrounding free speech in America. It examines whether hate speech should be criminalized, the impact of campus speech codes on democracy, and the rights involved in acts like flag burning. Through a clear and balanced analysis of contemporary court cases related to obscenity and workplace harassment, Kent Greenawalt provides insights for a general audience interested in the complexities of free speech issues today.
The book delves into the complex relationship between religion and public education in the wake of Supreme Court rulings against organized school prayer. Kent Greenawalt, a prominent constitutional scholar, examines contentious topics such as the teaching of evolution versus creationism, sex education, and students' rights to opt out of certain activities for religious beliefs. Through this exploration, the author raises critical questions about the appropriate role of religion in schools and the implications for educational policy.
The book explores the complex interplay between religious conviction and the principles of liberal democracy, highlighting challenges faced by judges and lawmakers. It addresses contentious issues such as the use of peyote in worship, the obligations of pacifists during military drafts, and the legal implications of parental medical decisions. By proposing a new framework, it aims to navigate the competing values of fairness, liberty, and constitutional validity in resolving these critical legal dilemmas.
The book explores the complex relationship between religious convictions and liberal democratic values, particularly in the context of legal challenges. It examines critical issues such as the allowance of devotional activities in public schools, the implications of the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, and the legality of religious symbols in public spaces. Offering a new framework, it aims to navigate the tensions between fairness, liberty, and constitutional principles, providing insights into how judges and lawmakers can address these contentious matters.